you're reading...
In The News - National

Connecticut Trans Rights Law Passes Senate, Governor To Sign Into Law

I’m so thrilled to see this make it through the Senate in my home state of Connecticut, and even happier that the Governor says they’ll sign it into law!  Way to go, Constitution State!  –MC

(Originally Posted On The Bilerico Project.)

By Dr. Jillian T. Weiss | June 04, 2011 2:15 PM

After several years of trying, the Connecticut State Senate has passed a trans rights bill, which now heads to the Governor’s desk for signature, and he has said he will sign it.

According to Meghan Stabler, this was a largely party line vote, with two Dems voting against it, passing by 20-16. It had squeaked by in the House last month, 77-76.

The bill adds the words “gender identity or expression” to the list of protected characteristics in jobs, housing and public accommodations.

It defines gender identity or expression as a person’s gender-related identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that gender-related identity, appearance or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s physiology or assigned sex at birth, which gender-related identity can be shown by providing evidence including, but not limited to, medical history, care or treatment of the gender-related identity, consistent and uniform assertion of the gender-related identity or any other evidence that the gender-related identity is sincerely held, part of a person’s core identity or not being asserted for an improper purpose. ”

The first part of the definition, about gender-related identity, whether or not traditionally associated, etc., is a standard phrase that intends to stop the use of gendered characteristics as a determinant in employment, housing and other areas of public life.

The second part, about a sincerely held belief in core identity, is a little less usual, but is found in a few laws around the country. I believe Boston has some similar phrasing in its law. Ultimately, since everyone has a gender identity and gender expressions, it is designed to protect everyone, trans or not. But it is clearly attempting to draw a line.

It should be noted that the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut previously ruled in 2008 that discrimination based on trans status is sex discrimination, and the State Human Rights Commission had issued a similar ruling around 2000. Thus, the statute codifies already existing Connecticut law.

Fun fact: The Connecticut State Motto is “Qui Transtulit Sustinet.”

Here’s a great colloquy between Rep Holder-Winfield and Peter Wolfgang from the ‘Family’ Institute of Connecticut, about the tired “sexual predators in the bathroom argument.” Well done, Rep. Holder-Winfield!



No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 69 other subscribers
%d bloggers like this: